![]()

The
King James Bible
Authorized Version
Do You Have A King James Bible?
Left click on bible to get
the KJV A/V in PDF format. About 2.87mb
__________________________________________________
What
We Believe And Teach | Scriptures
To Salvation
BEWARE of FEIGNED WORDS | How To Study | The NKJV-KJV-1611 Concerning The Best
HOLY BIBLE KJV THE METHODS USED FOR TRANSLATION | K.J.V & THE - N.I.V. | N.K.J.V. ANCIENT PAGAN TRINITY SYMBOL
The Beast of Revelation | The Final Event | Jack L Frost | TheTribulation | The King Of Babylon | The Matter of Egypt
Marvelous | John 3:16-36 | Just Suppose | Poems | Why the Flag is Folded 13 Times | Download book of Josephus /ZIP
King James A/V Free Download Software: Craig Richmond | Virginia Ramey Mollenkott | Rupert Murdoch | Where And What Is Hell?
Download
it now by clicking
here
about 2.5 megabytes).
AV 2000 can search and publish the AV 1611 (King James) Bible
text.
Use it as an electronic concordance for your personal bible study.
This software is free and freely distributable. By all means give it away!
Virginia Ramey Mollenkott,
A lesbian
who worked on the New International Version.
Mollenkott is a pro-abortion
feminist who claims to be a 'left-leaning' Evangelical.
In reality she denies
the very God of the Bible and worships an idolatrous female god of her own
imagination.
Updated August 24, 2001 (first published January 25,
1997) (David W. Cloud, Fundamental Baptist Information Service, P.O. Box 610368,
Port Huron, MI 48061-0368, 866-295-4143, fbns@wayoflife.org) - We have been
receiving many requests for information about Virginia Ramey Mollenkott, a
lesbian who worked on the New International Version. Mollenkott is a
pro-abortion feminist who claims to be a 'left-leaning' Evangelical. In reality
she denies the very God of the Bible and worships an idolatrous female god of
her own imagination. She grew up in a Plymouth Brethren fellowship and moved in
Fundamentalist circles during her early years. She studied at Bob Jones
University and taught at Shelton College in the 1950s. She has moved miles from
that position, though. Today she is an Episcopalian, serves as professor of
English at William Patterson College in New Jersey, and moves in the most
radical ecumenical feminist circles. In the 1970s, Virginia Mollenkott was a
consultant for the New International Version translating committee. She worked
on the NIV during the entire time it was being translated and reviewed.
In 1978 she co-authored (with Letha Scanzoni) the book entitled Is the
Homosexual My Neighbor?, in which she called for nondiscrimination toward
homosexuality. The book argues that the Sodom account in Genesis does not teach
the evil of homosexuality, but the evils of violent gang rape and inhospitality
to strangers. The book also claims that 'the idea of a life long homosexual
orientation or 'condition' is never mentioned in the Bible' (p. 71), and that
Romans 1 does not 'fit the case of a sincere homosexual Christian' (p. 62). This
is the exact position taken by one of the actual translators of the NIV, Dr.
Marten H. Woudstra, in a report he assisted in producing for the Christian
Reformed Church in 1973. (See the article "Homosexuality and the NIV,"
which is available in the Bible Version section of the End Times Apostasy
Database at the Way of Life web site http://www.wayoflife.org.)
In 1979 Mollenkott participated in the 9th General Conference of the Universal
Fellowship of Metropolitan Community Church (a denomination composed largely of
homosexuals). In a report which was published by the Christian Century,
Sept. 26, 1979, Mollenkott stated, 'This was the most grateful celebration of
Christ I had ever attended...'
In the early 1980s Mollenkott was a member of the National Council of Churches'
committee that produced an inclusive-language lectionary which addressed God in
feminine terms. At a news conference at the NCC's governing board meeting on
November 10, 1983, Mollenkott claimed there is some evidence that Jesus Christ
was really a woman. She cited the research of biologist Edward Kessel, who
argued that Jesus was "born in parthenogenesis; that parthenogenetic births
are always female; that in some cases, therefore, he would be willing to refer
to Jesus as 'she' -- up until the last minute of sex reversal, in which case
Jesus remains chromosomally female throughout life, but functions as a normal
male and looks like a normal male" (Christian Challenge, August
1984).
In October 1985, Mollenkott's signature appeared on a statement supporting
homosexuality which was published in the Sojourners magazine. The statement was
also signed by James B. Nelson of the American Lutheran denomination, author of
a book which promotes homosexual marriages and homosexual pastors.
In her plenary address before the July 1986 convention of the Evangelical
Women's Caucus International (EWCI), in Fresno, California, Mollenkott warned
against "heterosexism," the idea that everyone must be heterosexual.
In 1987 Mollenkott wrote an article claiming that refusal to ordain homosexual
"clergywomen" is unscriptural discrimination. She wrote: "To ask
lesbians and gay men to pretend they are like the majority is to deny them the
self-identification and affirmation that is the natural legacy of every healthy
adult. Forcing gay Christians into silence also denies them the opportunity to
celebrate in gratitude to God for their authentic nature and for their
life-enriching mutual relationship with a loving partner" (Christianity
and Crisis, Nov. 9, 1987).
In 1988 Mollenkott published the book Women, Men, and the Bible (New
York: Crossroad Publishing).
In the June 1991 issue of the Episcopal monthly entitled The Witness, she
testified, "My lesbianism has always been a part of me. ... I tried to be
heterosexual. I married myself off. But what I did ultimately realize was that
God created me as I was, and that this is where life was meaningful."
In 1993 Mollenkott published a book entitled Sensuous Spirituality: Out from
Fundamentalism (New York: Crossroad), in which she reflected on her
rejection of fundamentalism, her lesbian "coming out," and her belief
in a female God. Mollenkott concludes that "in a very physical sense we are
all gay, we are all lesbian, we are all heterosexual, we are all
bisexual--because we are all one" (p. 153). Her view of the kingdom of God
on earth is a society in which "lesbian women, bisexual people, and gay men
are going to be accepted as first-class citizens in the church and in society as
a whole" (p. 153). She defines sin as "the absence of trust"
(instead of disobedience to God's law) and defines salvation as "being
brought back into a trusting relationship by remembering Who We Are: God's
children, never actually separated from God's love even though we had imagined
we were" (p. 157). Her view of the new birth is as follows: "In the
instant of remembering our true identity, we are at-oned, restored to a trusting
relationship with God, with our Selves, with other people, and with the
universe" (p. 157). Mollenkott claims that providing mutual sexual
pleasure, whether it be homosexual or bisexual or whatever, is one of the most
important things in life. "Learning to love ourselves and others (including
mutual pleasuring) is the greatest contribution we can make to the creation of a
just society. And I am confident that the day will come when most Christian
churches will teach a creation-positive method of glorifying God and enjoying
Her forever" (p. 158). Mollenkott turns sin and righteousness upside down
by claiming that it is the "pleasure haters" (those who believe God
made the sexual relationship for heterosexual marriage only) who are the
"unjust" (p. 158). She claims that her lesbianism "is simply a
good gift, as all sexuality is a good gift" (p. 162). She admits that when
she first started admitting her lesbianism publicly she "felt slightly
soiled, as if I needed a good shower," but later she recognized "that
the soiled feeling was residual heterosexism" (p. 162). Mollenkott worships
a [wo]man-made idol she identifies as "our tender Father and our demanding
Mother and then again our loving Friend, faithful Companion, and cosmic
Lover" (p. 166).
At the November 1993 Re-imagining conference in Minneapolis, Minnesota, which
was sponsored by the World Council of Churches, Mollenkott said: "[Jesus]
is our elder brother, the trailblazer and constant companion for us--ultimately
is among many brothers and sisters in an eternal, equally worthy sibling-hood.
First born only in the sense that he was the first to show us that it is
possible to live in oneness with the divine source while we are here on this
planet. ... As an incest survivor, I can no longer worship in a theological
context that depicts God as an abusive parent [referring to Christ's death on
the cross] and Jesus as the obedient, trusting child." At the same
conference, Mollenkott said she longed to see the creation of an interfaith
"worship community" in which each member respected completely the
religion of the others and Christians ceased to make missionary efforts to
target members of other religions. She labeled soul-winning evangelism as
"imperialistic attempts to make others such as I."
In 1994 Mollenkott published The Divine Feminine: The Biblical Imagery of God
as Female (New York: Crossroad). This book is filled with such heretical
statements as, "The pursuit of holy peace within and the pursuit of peace
on earth are perhaps the best of all reasons for lifting up the biblical image
of God as the One Mother of us all" (p. 19) and "...because God is
womanlike--women are Godlike" (p. 78). Mollenkott suggests that "the
Lord's prayer might be addressed to 'Our Father/Mother who is in Heaven'"
(p. 116).
In the year 2001, Mollenkott published Omnigender: A Trans-religious Approach.
She describes her aversion to wearing dresses. "I feel myself to be female
all right, but masculine at the same time, so that dresses and skirts feel
rather ridiculous -- and this despite the fact that as a child I was not allowed
to wear overalls, shorts, or pants. [As we have seen, she grew up in a
fundamentalist home.] . . . One of the greatest benefits of coming out publicly
as lesbian was that I could go through my closets and give away all my dresses
and skirts except for a few Gertrude Stein-ish floor-length skirts that somehow
seemed less of an affront to my nature." This lesbian's admission that
dresses are feminine reminds us that clothing is a form of language. We make
social statements by our clothing choices. In Western society, pants have long
been associated with masculinity and dresses with femininity. That was based on
the biblical injunction that women and men are not to dress the same. Only in
recent decades has this barrier been breached, and those at the forefront of the
unisex fashion industry are in open and admitted rebellion against traditional
biblical mores.
Credit goes to http://www.wayoflife.org